May. 13th, 2006

dr_pretentious: (Default)
In today's issue of The Writer's Almanac, we learn that Georges Braque said, "There is only one valuable thing in art: the thing you cannot explain." Is it true? I have no idea, but I like thinking about it.

[livejournal.com profile] twoeleven, who has read every draft of every chapter of the big book, some of them more than once, and who has commented extensively on all of them--who does me the great kindness of pushing back wherever the book looks weak--sends me this bit from John Kenneth Galbraith's obituary in The Economist: "Mr. Galbraith strove to perfect his prose, reworking each passage at least five times. 'It was usually on about day four that I put in that note of spontaneity for which I am known', he once admitted." Yes, it's like that.

Today, reading the current issue of Locus, I came across a little piece about Somtow Sucharitkul, who is mounting a Buddhist interpretation of Wagner's Der Ring des Nibelungen in Bangkok. Yes, he thinks it's weird idea, too, but adds that "nothing important has ever happened in art when an audience has been ready for it." How tempting it is to flatter myself that I should take that statement as comfort, or even discouragement.

Profile

dr_pretentious: (Default)
Sarah Avery

October 2016

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910111213 1415
16171819 202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 01:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios