Last Garbage Day, not wanting to scare me in front of our toddler, Dan piled so many euphemisms into his warning about the rabid skunk that I thought he was telling me a funny anecdote, and as soon as he'd washed his hands and gone back on baby duty, I promptly went back to sleep.
Imagine my surprise when, hours later, I took Gareth out to see the garbage truck go by, and one of the neighbors ran down the street in a panic to warn me to get that baby inside right now and stay there until the Animal Control people arrived. Didn't I know the rabid skunk had last been seen in my yard, crawling under the bush right next to me?
The problem with Animal Control is that they don't actually want to find rabid animals. Well, would you? When they finally arrived, they drove one slow pass down our block, and when the rabid skunk wasn't in the open right where it had been reported to them three hours earlier, they drove off as if they were fleeing the scene of a crime. If they'd gotten out of their van, knocked on doors, and asked any of us, there was some risk we'd have told them where the skunk was, and then they'd have had to do something about it.
So I called the town to say the skunk was now under my porch, and we really needed Animal Control to come back and get it. "I've got a restless toddler who's begging to go outside," I said. "Explaining rabies to an 18-month-old is really hard. I don't know what I'll do if we're stuck in the house all day."
Here's the part that really blows my mind: On a 70 degree cloudy day with occasional moments of light drizzle, the town dispatcher's response to Animal Control's negligence was to say, "Well, I hope you're not letting a toddler outside to play on a day like today!"
My son is not made of spun sugar; light drizzle will not melt him. Keeping him locked up in the house all day would require television sooner or later. I'm pretty sure that wanting Animal Control to collect the rabid skunk from under my front porch does not make me a negligent parent.
Days later, what's still getting under my skin? Is it the fact that the rabid skunk had moved on by the time Animal Control got back, and it's never been found yet?
No, it's that some stranger on the phone impugned my motherly devotion.
How weird is that?
Imagine my surprise when, hours later, I took Gareth out to see the garbage truck go by, and one of the neighbors ran down the street in a panic to warn me to get that baby inside right now and stay there until the Animal Control people arrived. Didn't I know the rabid skunk had last been seen in my yard, crawling under the bush right next to me?
The problem with Animal Control is that they don't actually want to find rabid animals. Well, would you? When they finally arrived, they drove one slow pass down our block, and when the rabid skunk wasn't in the open right where it had been reported to them three hours earlier, they drove off as if they were fleeing the scene of a crime. If they'd gotten out of their van, knocked on doors, and asked any of us, there was some risk we'd have told them where the skunk was, and then they'd have had to do something about it.
So I called the town to say the skunk was now under my porch, and we really needed Animal Control to come back and get it. "I've got a restless toddler who's begging to go outside," I said. "Explaining rabies to an 18-month-old is really hard. I don't know what I'll do if we're stuck in the house all day."
Here's the part that really blows my mind: On a 70 degree cloudy day with occasional moments of light drizzle, the town dispatcher's response to Animal Control's negligence was to say, "Well, I hope you're not letting a toddler outside to play on a day like today!"
My son is not made of spun sugar; light drizzle will not melt him. Keeping him locked up in the house all day would require television sooner or later. I'm pretty sure that wanting Animal Control to collect the rabid skunk from under my front porch does not make me a negligent parent.
Days later, what's still getting under my skin? Is it the fact that the rabid skunk had moved on by the time Animal Control got back, and it's never been found yet?
No, it's that some stranger on the phone impugned my motherly devotion.
How weird is that?
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 05:46 am (UTC)Also, sorry I wasn't able to visit you this past week. Hopefully it will be remedied when you're in Connecticut! :)
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 03:38 am (UTC)Of course, I said this to my mother, by way of reassurance, and she pointed out that, "There's no way of knowing what it infected on its way out."
Skunks willing, we'll see you all in July.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 03:42 am (UTC)As I learned when the Animal Control guy finally got out of his van to take my questions, (a) the two diseases are hard to tell apart without an autopsy, and (b) New Jersey is officially considered to be "saturated" with rabies, so that only human cases have to be reported to the CDC, and the state only tests suspected animals if there's been a confirmed bite of a human or domestic animal.
You can imagine how heartened I was to hear the word "saturated" in that context.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 03:39 pm (UTC)MAO
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 03:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 12:29 pm (UTC)MAO
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 03:39 pm (UTC)I guess the moral of the story is that not all rabid skunks hide under bushes.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 03:46 am (UTC)There's something I can keep in mind next time a Nosy Stranger wants to tell me What's Best. Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 05:38 pm (UTC)Wait. That came out wrong.
It's not that I think your parenting is worthy of criticism! No, but because so many people are willing to stick their noses into other people's parenting.
Just remember what you said - staying inside would require TV. For most people - including the dispatcher I'll warrant - TV is not a thing to be avoided in parenting - it is a vital parenting survival tool. You are parenting in a way that s/he cannot understand and how do people react to things they don't understand?
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 11:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 04:05 am (UTC)Actually, that was almost exactly how the thought crossed my mind at the time. I've received bits of unwelcome advice from relatives, mostly from in-laws, but no more than any other parent does, and mostly it's been easy to deal with. I'd just been reading Ayelet Waldman's book of essays, Bad Mother, which Dan gave me for Mother's Day (weirdly, it was exactly what I'd been secretly hoping he'd give me), so it was especially fresh in my mind that I'd been lucky so far. All the Nosy Strangers I'd crossed paths with up till that point had been friendly ones, or at least inoffensive.
How did I get that lovely 18 month reprieve in the first place?
I'd concede that TV is a vital parenting survival tool, but it's a last resort, and I didn't feel like starting my day at 9am already on my last line of defense.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 07:03 pm (UTC)The email was sent to specific coworkers whom I felt were on good terms with me and supportive of our recent adoption. The Boys and Girls club was having a fundraiser selling candy and I brought it to work. (Call centers are wonderful places to sell candy if the bosses are okay with it) Anyway, in the email, I refered to the kids as "our monsters...er kids!" because it's a family joke that they're Monster 1 and Monster 2. They love the joke and usually respond by growling.
Our coworker, who's first son is about the same age as yours, felt it was her duty to caution my wife about calling them monsters. My wife's response was effectively "It's a family joke. If you spent some time with them, you'd get it."
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 04:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 09:08 pm (UTC)That totally made me LOL.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 04:36 am (UTC)I miss the f-bomb. I wouldn't have used it on the phone with the dispatcher, even before parenthood, but at least I would have been free to use it in the privacy of my living room after hanging up.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 11:25 am (UTC)And the dispatcher? I'd be peeved, too. In fact, I actually am seriously narked on your behalf. It really pushed my buttons on various levels.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 04:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-20 04:47 pm (UTC)Yeah, I wouldn't want to deal with a rabid skunk myself. But then, that's why I'm NOT an animal control officer. I also don't want to deal with snarky patrons or kids who disrupt other library patrons, but that's part of my job.
As for the dispatcher: I think Jamesenge hit it right on. Why in pete's name does everyone think that the best way to parent to make sure that kids and germs don't come within 10 miles of each other? They play in the dirt and mud, get yelled at for making a mess, and learn to deal with unpleasantness. I did it, and there's nothing wrong with me!!
[thinks about it for a moment]
Alright, maybe not the best example, but...
no subject
Date: 2009-05-21 04:44 am (UTC)I've heard a lot of true tales of childhood misery, but not once have I heard anyone complain that they were allowed to play in the dirt too much, or that they got drizzled on too often.