It was an odd moment in the history of technology, the year I learned to type. My high school still conducted its typing instruction in a room full of actual typewriters, while at home I practiced typing on a then-cutting-edge Apple IIe.
Both my typing teacher and my typing instruction video game--the one in which I blew away invading aliens with the speed of my return to the home row--insisted that the end of every sentence was to be followed by two taps of the space key. Apparently that's an antiquated non-rule rule now, one that actively annoys people in production departments at publishing houses. Who knew?
So tonight, pining for the Big Book, I did a search-and-replace to bring that manuscript up to current typographical standards. (I'd love to dive back into the Beltresin novels, but I have other promises to keep first, so no mucking about in the story for me.) In a matter of seconds, it was 32 pages shorter. It's still too long, of course, but the page count at the bottom of the screen is no longer quite so mortifying.
Microsoft Word informs me that there are slightly more than 16,000 sentences in the Big Book. On no particular basis, I would have guessed there would be more. One eliminated keystroke, times 16,000...if I'd tried to cut that many pages of actual storytelling, it would have taken a week's work at my current pace--a week, assuming seven consecutive days of getting out of the house to write, which doesn't generally happen here in Parentworld. I suppose it would be possible to Just Cut Stuff faster than that, but I'd rather cut thoughtfully than fast.
Thirty-two pages. I think that really is the last of the low-hanging fruit.
Both my typing teacher and my typing instruction video game--the one in which I blew away invading aliens with the speed of my return to the home row--insisted that the end of every sentence was to be followed by two taps of the space key. Apparently that's an antiquated non-rule rule now, one that actively annoys people in production departments at publishing houses. Who knew?
So tonight, pining for the Big Book, I did a search-and-replace to bring that manuscript up to current typographical standards. (I'd love to dive back into the Beltresin novels, but I have other promises to keep first, so no mucking about in the story for me.) In a matter of seconds, it was 32 pages shorter. It's still too long, of course, but the page count at the bottom of the screen is no longer quite so mortifying.
Microsoft Word informs me that there are slightly more than 16,000 sentences in the Big Book. On no particular basis, I would have guessed there would be more. One eliminated keystroke, times 16,000...if I'd tried to cut that many pages of actual storytelling, it would have taken a week's work at my current pace--a week, assuming seven consecutive days of getting out of the house to write, which doesn't generally happen here in Parentworld. I suppose it would be possible to Just Cut Stuff faster than that, but I'd rather cut thoughtfully than fast.
Thirty-two pages. I think that really is the last of the low-hanging fruit.
no subject
Date: 2009-08-30 05:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-30 07:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-30 10:50 am (UTC)I do it too
Date: 2009-08-30 02:40 pm (UTC)Re: I do it too
Date: 2009-08-30 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-08-30 04:43 pm (UTC)Anything actually published, however, is being properly typeset in professional layout software, and double spaces in that playing field create weird little runnels of white space running through the text, dragging your eye hither and yon. Layout typography's main purpose is to create a smooth, even "color" to the paragraphs on the page, so that your eye flows easily from one line to the next without distractions. (That's why you'll never see ALL CAPS in book text, or you shouldn't -- small caps are used instead, except for short acronyms, so it looks emphasized when you actually get to it, but it doesn't grab your attention before you get to that bit of text. No bolds used in books either, for the same reason; italics provides emphasis without being glaring.)
But I wonder why they were that upset by it? Removing them is an easy search-and-replace, and it's the first thing I do after importing new text. Then I do more global replacements, turning -- into proper em dashes and so forth. Not even REMOTELY the most irritating thing that has to be done when importing text, although in a large document it can take a few minutes to process. But it's an easy fix, and it comes with the territory.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-01 04:21 am (UTC)Thank you for the long explanation. There are things I used to half-know about typesetting from my mom's days as a medical editor, but she got into that field in the waning days of the linotype machine and was the first kid on her block to learn desktop publishing on the first programs that came out. I can never be sure which of the things I sort of remember would still be relevant.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-01 04:57 am (UTC)Cathy and I do the same,
Date: 2009-08-31 04:04 pm (UTC)Re: Cathy and I do the same,
Date: 2009-09-01 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-03 12:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-14 05:12 am (UTC)