Sarah, I don't think I've ever edited a manuscript that clean before. I had very little to do--a couple of things here and there, self-explanatory, and most of them I'll defer to you if you disagree with me.
And that's it. I hope I haven't used up all my good revision letter karma on the first book.
Thank you, faithful beta readers. You know who you are. I don't do too badly on my own, but it takes help from a lot of keen, fresh eyes to earn a revision letter like that. You make me look good.
And that's it. I hope I haven't used up all my good revision letter karma on the first book.
Thank you, faithful beta readers. You know who you are. I don't do too badly on my own, but it takes help from a lot of keen, fresh eyes to earn a revision letter like that. You make me look good.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 05:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 07:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 11:53 am (UTC)Congratulations!
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 06:27 pm (UTC)As to using up your karma - did you do anything with this manuscript that you won't do again? It seems to me that you have developed a winning system for getting your work up to your own very high standards - you rock!
no subject
Date: 2008-03-27 08:24 pm (UTC)I've always said this.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-28 01:22 am (UTC)Oooo, Natural 20 on the proofreading roll
Date: 2008-03-30 06:24 am (UTC)